When it
comes to video games, you could call me anything but an expert. I grew up in a
house where the only gaming console we had was a Gameboy Color, and the only
thing I played on that was Mario World 2 and Pokémon Blue, Yellow, and Silver
(my brother has Red and Gold). Just a few years ago, we got a Wii as a family
Christmas present. The reasoning behind this was my dad thought it was a more
hands-on type of video game system. Well he was right, for the most part. Yes
the Wii does have games that involve moving your body as you flick and point
the “Wiimote.” Pretty soon the only games I consistently played were Wii
Bowling and Mario Kart. This brings me to the article Jane McGonigal wrote and
the point I’m trying to make. To put it simply, I heartily disagree with her
thesis statement. I do respect her talent as a game designer and her optimism
towards making the world a better place. However, I feel that making the world
a better place will not occur as a result of people applying what they learn
from playing hours upon hours video games.
First of
all, and I’m sure many of my classmates have said this already, but the kinds
of video games that the youth are addicted to are shooters and other kinds of
violent video games. I don’t think many people are playing the kinds of games
that will exercise people’s collaborative and creative skills. Another reason
that can’t be overlooked is the health that these video gamers are in. Most of
them are overweight if not obese, and this problem is most closely directed to
their lack of physical exercise and poor diet. If these gamers were to increase
the amount of time they play, that problem will only increase. Lastly, I’ve
come to the conclusion that many people play video games as a release from
their daily routine. Ironically, playing video games has become a part of the
daily routine, but only for leisure. I highly doubt that gamers are playing
video games to gradually enhance their intellect to solve real world problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment