So, we already know the textbook
definition of “popular culture”, the everyday objects, actions, and events that
shape our behaviors and beliefs. But, seeing that popular culture is a facet of
our everyday life, I can’t help but
feel that popular culture has to do with something called Information Overload, which was this idea proposed by computer
scientist Vannevar Bush in his writing, “As We May Think” for The Atlantic in 1945. Bush proposed this
idea that humans needed to create the means of managing information overload
through a partnership with computers.
I find popular culture as a form of information overload, except we’re
not always going to be using
computers to manage the information overload.
I think that the first step in managing this overload of
popular culture, it’s important to recognize the source of the popular culture. The trouble with that, though, is
that we’re living in a democratized media environment where anyone can create
media, which in turn, will affect us in some way in the form of popular
culture. Being able to recognize the source of popular culture can be useful to
us when studying it. Similar to way we would apply rhetorical perspectives,
identifying sources of popular culture makes analysis more orderly and provides
both a common language and technique, which would differ across different
sources. Being able to recognizing sources of popular culture and apply a
rhetorical perspective is significant because we can study why and how popular culture
affects our attitudes, beliefs, and opinions.
No comments:
Post a Comment